ACRO Single Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 3:  Tine Kirchberg - GER

Ranking Index = 4,05

 Lauterbach Turnt, EDFT - Lauterbach, 2.6.2022 - 5.6.2022
Pilots from
Judges nation
Panel average High value
 HZ anomalies Low value
 Sports - Power, 2nd Known Sequence
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Fig-7 Fig-8 Fig-9 Fig-10 Fig-11 Posi No RI / FP J-rank Diff
1 Martin Laubner 8,0 8,0 8,5 8,0 8,0 7,0 9,0 9,0 7,5 8,0 8,0 9,0 0 1228,1 1
  RV-4 D-EFFI 8,31 8,62 8,47 8,31 8,05 7,11 9,66 9,66 7,62 8,31 8,05 9,14   1228,0    
2 Ferdinand Popp 7,0 7,0 7,0 9,0 7,5 7,0 7,0 7,0 7,0 7,5 7,0 8,0 0 1127,2 2
  RV-4 D-EFFI 7,18 7,57 7,21 9,43 7,63 7,11 7,57 7,57 7,11 7,74 7,21 8,13   1159,7    
3 Werner Kraus 8,0 7,0 PZ 7,0 HZ 7,5 7,0 7,0 7,0 7,0 5,0 AV 3 678,6 4 -1
  Z526F D-EXBA 8,31 7,57 6,31 7,18 7,11 7,62 7,57 7,57 7,11 7,18 5,52 7,51   1065,0    
4 Matthias Jungkurth 8,0 6,5 7,0 7,0 HZ 7,0 7,0 7,5 6,0 7,0 6,5 7,0 1 972,9 3 +1
  Yak 52 LY-YVT 8,31 7,05 7,21 7,18 6,75 7,11 7,57 8,10 6,10 7,18 6,79 7,11   1049,2    
    0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0   2
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

          Judge   O/all    Proportion

21 max None HZ PZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ - -  
 PZ to CHZ - -  
 AV to CHZ - -  
 AV to Mark 1 1    
 PZ to Mark - -  
 HZ to Mark 2 7  
 Lo to Mark - -  
 Hi to Mark - -  

 The 60% rule

- -  

  Judge Anomalies vs. totals from all Judges

  Judge 3 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies   Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 6 Judge x1 Ch.Judge
Matthias Jungkurth Fig-5 HZ 7,5 HZ 6,0 7,0 OK
Yak 52 LY-YVT   6,75 7,85 6,75 5,90 6,49  
Werner Kraus Fig-5 HZ 7,0 HZ HZ HZ OK
Z526F D-EXBA   7,11 7,11 7,11 7,11 7,11  
Werner Kraus Positioning 7,0 8,0 AVGE 7,0 8,0 OK
Z526F D-EXBA   7,10 8,10 7,51 6,97 7,87  
 
Score anomalies (none)  
 
 Average and Spread of Marks
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 7,37, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1,62 Panel average mark = 7,65, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1,60
 
 Review of RI Contributions per Pilot
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
score
Bias
Hi/Lo
Panel
score
Score
difference
Judge
rank
Panel
rank
Rank
diff'ce
RI value
this pilot
Percent
of total
  RI contributions ranked
  by decreasing size
Matthias Jungkurth Yak 52 1111,1 -   1047,4 + 63,7 3 4 + 1 2,40 59,2%
Werner Kraus Z526F 1014,2 -   1058,6 - 44,4 4 3 - 1 1,65 40,8%
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
score
  Panel
score
Score
difference
Judge
rank
Panel
rank
       
Martin Laubner RV-4 1195,1   1201,3 - 6,2 1 1        
Ferdinand Popp RV-4 1161,9   1174,9 - 13,0 2 2        
 
 Summary of RI Contributions per Nation
Judge:

Max nation bias = 0,74

Min = 0,00 Average = 0,74
Panel:

= 0,74

= 0,00  = 0,74
 
Most favoured Least favoured Average x 4

Ranking Index totals per nation
using the +/- rank differences to show
national bias from the most to the
least favoured teams of Pilots

The number of Pilots in each nation
is shown with the nationality

 

Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 5.1 Build: 06.05.22